posts: 340727
Data license: Public Domain
This data as json
| post_id | thread_id | thread_title | post_number | author_username | post_date | post_date_iso | post_body |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340727 | 21050 | Gutting NOAA | 91 | seabird | Mar 14, 2025 | 2025-03-14T17:27:32-0400 | Spiral Bee said: Yes I would. One of these alternatives results in some bird deaths and spoiled vistas. The other threatens the health and viability of the living planet writ large. But that's neither here nor there, because Trump / Project 2025 is hell-bent on crippling the ability of agencies to even weigh these considerations in the way we're doing here. Please just look at the regimes that Trump and his friends admire: Russia, North Korea, Hungary. In another time and place I would have been more enthused about discussing with you the merits of various energy sources, but I can't do it now, in this context. You see, you want to debate on the grounds of fact, reason, and efficiency, which is admirable on its face, but naive in this context, as though taking at face value that efficiency is what the Department of Government Efficiency was about. The name of the agency is no truer than those of the Ministry of Peace, the Ministry of Truth or the Ministry of Plenty in Orwell's 1984. But I too appreciate your willingness to tangle Click to expand... The last administration literally had a ministry of truth- it was called the "Disinformation Governance Board" and they in fact censored and altered truth. Big Orwell fan. The Road to Wigan Pier was eye opening for me. |